About Me Resume Cellular Automata Java
Aikido Music Teaching Games
Chess Humor Bioinformatics Gif89a
Helicopter Poetry Encryption Links

Seuss
Parodies
Bits in Bytes
Grinch OO Coder
Lunch
Star Trek
The Bible
Dante's Inferno
Purity Test
O.J. Trial
Green Eggs and Pork
Computer Manual
USville
Wedding
Other
Parodies
404
Beatles
Bobbit
Clinton
Favorite Things
Ham Xmas
ICBM Pizza
Net Is Slow
PC Xmas
Poe
Prayer
Queen
Sermon
Song
Song Tests
Thermo
Twas
Unified
Unix abc
Warnings
Santa's Unix Listing
Millenium Pie
M$ TV Dinners
Other
Humor
Cartoons
One Liners
Administratium
Bad spec
daemon OS
Days off
Dead horse
Dosfish
FAA report
GM helpline
Family tree
Strapping
H2O
Haiku
Harvard
Job
Koans
Loan
Memos
Money
Moron
MS
Accidents
Navy
Phrases
Plan
The Project
Anything
SysAdmin Woes
Thesis
A Guide to Effective Scientific Communication
Phrase Translation
 
It has long been known I haven't bothered to look up the reference
 
It is believed I think
 
It is generally believed A couple of guys think so too
 
It is not unreasonable to assume If you believe this, you'll believe anything
 
Of great theoretical importance I find it kind of interesting
 
Of great practical importance I can get some mileage out of it
 
Typical results are shown The best results are shown
 
3 samples were choosen for further study The others didn't make sense, so we ignored them
 
The 4 hour sample was not studied I dropped it on the floor
 
The 4 hour determination may not be significant I dropped it on the floor, but scooped most of it up
 
The significance of these results is unclear Look at the pretty artifact is unclear
 
It has not been possible to provide definitive answers The experiment was negative, but at least I can publish the data somewhere
 
Correct within an order of magnitude Wrong
 
It might be argued that I have such a good answer for this objection that I shall now raise it
 
Much additional work will be required This paper is not very good, but neither is that of anyone else
 
These investigations proved highly rewarding My grant is going to be renewed
 
It has long been known that... I haven't bothered to look up the original reference
 
...of great theoretical and practical importance ...interesting to me
 
While it has not been possible to provide definite answers to these questions. The experiments didn't work out, but I figured I could at least get a publication out of it.
 
The W-Pb system was chosen as especially suitable to show the predicted behavior... The fellow in the next lab had some already made up
 
High purity...
Very high purity...
Extremely high purity...
Super-purity...
Spectroscopically pure...
Composition unknown except for the exaggerated claims of the supplier
 
A fiducial reference line... A scratch
 
Three of the samples were chosen for detailed study... The results of the others didn't make sense and were ignored...
 
...handled with extreme care during the experiments ...not dropped on the floor
 
Typical results are shown... The best results are shown...
 
Although some detail has been lost in reproduction, it is clear from the original micrograph that... It is impossible to tell from the micrograph
 
Presumably at longer times... I didn't take the time to find out
 
The agreement with the predicted curve is excellent fair
 
good poor
 
satisfactory doubtful
 
fair imaginary
 
...as good as could be expected non-existent
 
These results will be reported at a later date I might get around to this sometime
 
The most reliable values are those of Jones He was a student of mine
 
It is suggested that...
It is believed that...
It may be that...
I think...
 
It is generally believed that.... I have such a good objection to this answer that I shall now raise it.
 
It is clear that much additional work will be required before a complete understanding... I don't understand it
 
Unfortunately, a quantitative theory to account for these effects has not been formulated Neither does anybody else
 
Correct within an order of magnitude Wrong
 
It is to be hoped that this work will stimulate further work in the field This paper isn't very good but neither are any of the others on this miserable subject
 
Thanks are due to Joe Glotz for assistance with the experiments and to John Doe for valuable discussions. Glotz did the work and Doe explained what it meant.

jde@acm.org Last modified 136 weeks 3 days 19 hours 11 minutes ago.