| Phrase |
Translation |
| |
| It has long been known |
I haven't bothered to look up the reference |
| |
| It is believed |
I think |
| |
| It is generally believed |
A couple of guys think so too |
| |
| It is not unreasonable to assume |
If you believe this, you'll believe anything |
| |
| Of great theoretical importance |
I find it kind of interesting |
| |
| Of great practical importance |
I can get some mileage out of it |
| |
| Typical results are shown |
The best results are shown |
| |
| 3 samples were choosen for further study |
The others didn't make sense, so we ignored them |
| |
| The 4 hour sample was not studied |
I dropped it on the floor |
| |
| The 4 hour determination may not be significant |
I dropped it on the floor, but scooped most of it up |
| |
| The significance of these results is unclear |
Look at the pretty artifact is unclear |
| |
| It has not been possible to provide definitive answers |
The experiment was negative, but at least I can publish the data somewhere |
| |
| Correct within an order of magnitude |
Wrong |
| |
| It might be argued that |
I have such a good answer for this objection that I shall now raise it |
| |
| Much additional work will be required |
This paper is not very good, but neither is that of anyone else |
| |
| These investigations proved highly rewarding |
My grant is going to be renewed |
| |
| It has long been known that... |
I haven't bothered to look up the original reference |
| |
| ...of great theoretical and practical importance |
...interesting to me |
| |
| While it has not been possible to
provide definite answers to these questions. |
The experiments didn't work
out, but I figured I could at
least get a publication out of it. |
| |
| The W-Pb system was chosen as
especially suitable to show the predicted behavior... |
The fellow in the next lab had some already made up |
| |
High purity...
Very high purity...
Extremely high purity...
Super-purity...
Spectroscopically pure... |
Composition unknown except for the exaggerated claims of the supplier |
| |
| A fiducial reference line... |
A scratch |
| |
| Three of the samples were chosen for detailed study... |
The results of the others didn't make sense and were ignored... |
| |
| ...handled with extreme care during the experiments |
...not dropped on the floor |
| |
| Typical results are shown... |
The best results are shown... |
| |
| Although some detail has been lost
in reproduction, it is clear from the
original micrograph that... |
It is impossible to tell from the micrograph |
| |
| Presumably at longer times... |
I didn't take the time to find out |
| |
| The agreement with the predicted curve is excellent |
fair |
| |
| good |
poor |
| |
| satisfactory |
doubtful |
| |
| fair |
imaginary |
| |
| ...as good as could be expected |
non-existent |
| |
| These results will be reported at a later date |
I might get around to this sometime |
| |
| The most reliable values are those of Jones |
He was a student of mine |
| |
It is suggested that...
It is believed that...
It may be that... |
I think... |
| |
| It is generally believed that.... |
I have such a good objection to this answer that I shall now raise it. |
| |
| It is clear that much additional
work will be required before a
complete understanding... |
I don't understand it |
| |
| Unfortunately, a quantitative theory
to account for these effects has not
been formulated |
Neither does anybody else |
| |
| Correct within an order of magnitude |
Wrong |
| |
| It is to be hoped that this work
will stimulate further work in the field |
This paper isn't very good but neither are any of the others
on this miserable subject |
| |
| Thanks are due to Joe Glotz for
assistance with the experiments and
to John Doe for valuable discussions. |
Glotz did the work and Doe explained what it meant. |